life is strange, often beautiful, then you die

---

Life emerges, has its day, departs to nowhere, and remains unknown, except for we persons who may remember a life.

We are the only species that conceives futures and may remember, briefly, long, maybe canonically, maybe historically. But only persons do that, not the deer, not the poor mayfly.

Say what you will about the cosmos. Investigate until you die. Yet,
the glorious reality of it all is us: the only known intelligence in the galaxy, the only intelligence on Earth that inquires persistently.

We are the only form of life which may design futures which may be actualized.

we will contact you in good time

---

Once upon a time, people believed that there were Martians wanting to contact us. The NYTimes article today about 1924 fervor about that is darling, yet implicitly dramatizes how fast our technological resourcefulness is evolving, given what scientists are doing now.

Below is a comment I posted today at the article.

Around the time of the Opposition fervor, Edwin Hubble opened a “Copernican” revolution by discovering that all the stars we had seen were merely part of one galaxy—or that most of those “stars” were other galaxies.  

So, all of that was a background to what became of philosophy in the 20th century—especially "the question of being" (Heidegger, _Being and Time_, 1927)  

We are so early in our evolution of intelligent apprehension.  

imminent fiction

---

Luis Elizondo, former head of the U.S. government’s investigation into UFO reports (now: U.A.P.s: unidentified aerial phenomena) will have a book about it all, August 20, titled Imminent. Yesterday, the New York Times posted an article about the upcoming book.  

Following is a letter I sent to the Times today, quoting from the article.

If Mr. Elizondo, author of Imminent, knew dangerously more than he can say, his life would be in danger—his security, not national security.  

It’s more likely that the “left” hand of DARPA [Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency] needed a cover program which the “right” hand (Elizondo’s unwitting distractive management) didn’t know about, e.g., how to make non-existent phenomena appear on radar.  

Is the Singularity nearer?

---

“Human-level” “understanding” is not merely a range from “content generation to reasoning” (which A.I. pioneers misconceive). That is, human understanding is not merely cognitive, because intentionality and identification with preferred value (feeling) are integral to any human conception of interested action.